Thursday, October 4, 2012

Insurance claims

Disclosure: My particular experience, that I am exposing, is with the Sun Life Financial of Canada. And to be honest, it could happen anywhere. The reason that it is such an issue with me is that the claim was for a fairly large amount. The kind that makes you fail a mortgage payment... potentially.
The kind that is, if you are the sole earning person in the household, yuo can,t just have laying around.

The whole adventure begins with me at the drugstore, having to purchase over 6000$ (initially) in meds. According to the laws of the land, if our social medical system covers a drug, so must a private or group (company) insurers, first. Let us just say that the drugs needed to be bought then and now, because it was a time sensitive treatment. My wife is standing at the druggists counter. It's Friday, early afternoon. (Friday Sept 7, 2012)

She presents my medical insurance card, and of course, the insurer declines, paying for the medication.

Okay I provisioned my credit card with a line of credit of 6000$, and had to dip into my saving for the rest. No biggie, I'll file a claim and get a refund soon enough, I'll get my money back. A claim can be processed as fast as within a week, so I figure 2 weeks tops, no sweat, it won't event affect the monthly budget.

O how wrong was I.

The first signs of trouble came when I called the insurance hot line and asked for the procedure to go forward with my claim. The level one service said I would need an "exception form" filled by the appropriate medical staff, that it was a common thing. So trusting it was so, I hang up with the insurer, call the private clinic, the forms specialist nurse responds and tells us: "no, I have no clue what form the insurer is referring to." And if anything this a form the insurer should supply. Again I get on the phone with the insurance company whom I ask again, which forms they need. (assuming they need it, they should know what it is right?)

This time the person on the phone is a bit more clued-in and says what is the medication. I tell her the type of medication(s). Now she informs me that without the names according to the druggist she cannot provide which form is needed. I asked her to wait a moment while I get my wife on the line to get the names of the drugs to which she promptly responds: "no I'm sorry I can't stay on the line, please call back later". It's nearing the end of the day, the "forms specialist" nurse at the private clinic has left. The insurance company is no help, I am heading for the druggists to pay for the medication and head home. We'll sort this out later. It's Friday evening, I had it.

An important note, the druggists were baffled by the lack of response and/or accountability that both the insurance company and the clinic were demonstrating. So, they took the initiative to do some investigating and finally found the form, which is publicly available, on the government's website, I find out later. Kudos to them (Uniprix Ginette Poissant!)

Furthermore a very specific memo has been published called "INTÉRÊTS en bref #246" (also publicly available, yeah I'm a French Canadian) at Sun Life's website, outlining, the medication they now must cover. Nevertheless they insist I must get the form filled out, so I do, on Tuesday morning, the 11th (my wife is in person at the Clinic). The nurse charges 30$ (which I believe is unethical, because we are dependent on this government issued form, to file an insurance claim), and she faxes it immediately to the insurer.

On the next day, (12th) I diligently call in, to Sun Life, to make sure it's all in order. The gentleman on the phone says they have received the fax and that all is OK. I specifically ask, "is there any missing information or documentation to proceed with the claim?" He responds that they have ALL THEY need to proceed. And an "answer" will be mailed to us, concerning the exception filing. Keep in mind the #246 memo above.

Five days later (17th) (oh because we were lucky, because they allow a week [sarcasm]) we are without news, so I call in and enquire. The line one service rep tells us, it has been filed as a refusal but cannot tell me on what grounds and that the claim is closed. I try to get an explanation, but the best he is willing (or able to, I don't care) to say is: you might have to re-file and supply more information next time. So I ask, what information, can I get, that was missing? Again, like a pre-recorded message he says, I can only say that you will know when you get the letter in the mail (which can arrive as late as next Monday!) So at my insistence to know whats going on, he suggests to speak to a supervisor: to which I am transferred.

The supervisor that comes on the line isn't any more helpful, and as a matter of fact, she lies outright to my ear: they (sun Life's agents) cannot disclose the information because the letter is from a "doctor" (suggesting the person evaluating our case was an M.D.) and they, the support agent and claims people, are not allowed to see client-doctor privileged info. Which made sense, at the time. But a lie, I say again. In any case, the agent says that I can follow up, once the letter received with another supervisor. All I have to do is ask for one next time.

In fact the letter arrived early that same afternoon, and nothing about the person signed it suggested that they were an M.D. and in fact they are just a "controller" according their title. Hence the lie.

Nevertheless, it explains that the case is still open (lie #2 from the previous staff member I spoke to, earlier) and that they require the DIN (drug identification number) for each medication and a "reason" to explain what the patient needs it. Again the professional that filled the form and the professional that received (or reviewed it ) had both failed at this. Since the nurse at the clinic was more "accessible" we opted to see with her how we could re-file and she agreed to re-file (no charge) with the DINs and a note that explains why the drugs are needed. We are now the 24th. and the doctor at the clinic prescribes another 2000+$ of medication.

I am obviously concerned that this will degenerate further, so I call up the insurance company once again and ask to speak to a supervisor. I find out first that they didn't receive the fax. However (and this is a turning point, the supervisor I get, leaves me her direct line (extension) a reference number and a promise to follow up quickly, considering the amounts now in order. I call up the clinic and explain the case, the nurse giggles "come on, what's going on, I sent the fax and got a confirmation receipt". Nevertheless, she faxes it again.

Late that afternoon, the supervisor at sun life finally confirms that all is in an that it will be processed as diligently as possible.

Friday, the 28th at around 4 P.M., the supervisor calls me and explains that the case has been reviewed and that (some) of the drugs should have been paid for outright (sigh) and that the others were now "approved". However, she informs me, the actual client-claim form is missing. I said, what claim form, I called in on the 12th to make sure all was sent in and in order and now (it's nearing the end of the month) you tell me I am missing forms, again?! At this point I am cursing in my beard. This supervisor has been nothing but helpful, but I'm thinking, there's no way I'm going to get this to her before the end of the day, and I don't, the fax was sent at 19:30hrs (approx) on the 28th.

Monday 1st of October, I call in, leave a voice message to the supervisor. I'm trying to follow-up. I get a call back at 15:00 hrs, no fax received. Again we have a confirmation, nevertheless it gets "lost" in the system, again. UNBELIEVABLE!. So while I have the supervisor on the line I fax it again, myself, from work. At 15:45, the supervisor confirms that she received it and proceeds in telling me she will do all she can to have this filed ASAP. She promises to call back when it's done.

It is Thursday, the 4th of October. 14;00 hrs+. Still nothing.

In a few days, my credit card company will be charging me 19%, if I don't pay them back. So I stand to lose 1500$+ if the insurance company doesn't pull through before Monday.

And you know what? no one is accountable in this entire adventure, but me. There is no mechanism short of a lawsuit to ensure that there is any kind of liability for the lack of diligence it this affair.

It is upsetting, unfair and simply repugnant.

It is the equivalent of paying for a parachute for nearly 25 years now (being employed means paying for private insurance, by law) and when you pull the cord all kinds of hoops need to be jumped through, none of them very timely and the ground may still hit you in the face.

Oh, and too bad about the money you put in in your insurance all your life, 'cause in fact you are assured of nothing, really.

What could have gone differently:

  1. Better training with the agents (easy call here).
  2. From the first call in, a reference number (ID) should be assigned. That ensures a common line for all follow-ups. This identification number should allow to trace any documentation, calls, faxes or forms reviewed or submitted in a case.
  3. I cannot believe I am the first to have claimed these medications and I am NOT!. There should be a clear outlined procedure that went along with memo #246. what forms are needed and so on. I cannot believe this is not in their knowledge base. Furthermore, the memo wasn't a week old, it should be fresh in memory! If I can find this memo on your own website, then I assume an employee should, as well, if not better!
  4. Record all calls, period. Accountability at the first and second level response will greatly dissuade misinformation or patronizing.
  5. It's the 21st century, why must I rely on snail-mail and faxes. All should be done online. everyone can submit PDF documents, at least make it a darn option! I for one am very aware of the high level of competence and ingeniousness of the I.T. department at Sun Life.
  6. No matter how the file is sent in, make sure it is trackable for the client. Web/phone/mobile. Whatever. This way we won't keep calling to follow up in the first place!
  7. Network/inbox faxes are unreliable?, so don't make us rely on them!
  8. Have links to related forms on memos or claims. Use the power of basic HTML. If we try to file a claim online and cannot, make it Darn clear where to get the forms and for what.

But what is the moral of the story, if any?

Insurance companies have no real interest in being diligent. As a matter of fact, the longer they can hold on to your money, the more they can play with it and potentially make profits with investment interests. So one must do all they can (and perhaps it will still fail) to be sure about everything when dealing with them.
 

They have every interest to pay you as slowly and as less as possible.

Another thing to consider is that insurance companies don't really compete. Maybe a bit on a one on one scale, but where the big bucks are, no. Anyone in managerial positions with decent size companies will tell you that there are cartels between the big insurance companies and if your employer tries to get a squeeze on them for any reason (like getting a better quote or dropping them after the first year term for poor performance) the "word" will spread out quickly and other insurance companies will refuse to insure the company's employees until the company plays ball!

Once an account manager of an insurance company has you face to face in his private office, he will tell you this to your face, it's all off the books so it's OKAY! And since having a private group company insurance is required by law, well insurance companies are the spider in the web.

They can lipserve that they are sorry or embarrased by a delay or a "situation" but they invest millions in better tools to improve their ROI and analyze better revenue channels, with the capital they get from us. We are the least of their concerns.

They don't even bother sending you a card for medication claims anymore, and they offset that cost, by making YOU PRINT IT!
 
Wow! What great service can you expect from a company that does that? Yeah, you get the picture.

I'd like to say "caveat emptor", here, but unfortunately I don't see how one can beat this system... however I must say, public enquiries are getting very popular these days with aspiring politicians.

To be continued.

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

The last straw.

Lately, for personal reasons, I have been confronted with this metaphor as an explanation or a justifications for cutting ties. It had be gnawing at me for a while and I suppose either my subconscious or my instinct told me there was something wrong about this explanation. I now have an answer and I think it is important enough a revelation that I might share it with you.

First, a quick decomposition.
The expression goes: that's the last straw, that broke the camel's (or other beast of burden's) back.
The beast of burden is usually a metaphor for some one's tolerance or patience towards something or someone and the straw(s) on it's back some kind of irritant that wears on the tolerance.

Let's call the camel's owner: the second party.

Now I'm not one placed to judge any one's tolerances or patience, but in each case where this explanation will be used, you should consider that the person or entity you are dealing with, is themselves, bringing up their ability to tolerate or the quantity of patience they have. Which in any case should force you to examine exactly just how tolerant or patient they are.

To pursue the metaphor, it forces us to look at the camel and see just how big and or strong it may, or may not be.

Secondly, it begs to examine exactly the burden that is been be put upon it. If someone says they "can't take it anymore", there is an opportunity there to examine what exactly are the emotional (or other) impositions/transgressions that have been beset upon them.
Even so, the conclusion may become a rather bitter examination all in all of the situation. Like I was saying this may be a explanation or a justification for taking some drastic actions, though I cannot, in all good consciousness, say it is necessarily a good one.

Depending on your level of intimacy with the second party relating that "that's the last straw", you might be inclined to wonder: "why did they wait so long before evaluating the camel's ability and hence saving it's back?" That's a good question.
Because you see, these figurative camels, belong to the second party and can be conjured up with rather ease and their value subjective. Not to mean that they are an infinite ressource, but essentially the actual "value" or ability of anyone's tolerances can also be a choice.

So given a particular relationship, patience may be abundant one way and towards another it may not. This is entirely discretionary and subjective. But again, because of the way the second party is expressing it, they have suggested at least that it was a pretty good investment or a good effort on their side, because let's face it, camels aren't supposed to be cheap or weak, right?

Well that's kind of the point. The "offended" party has a certain upkeep of their camel(s) to do, if they have any value. And if out of the blue their camel just all of a sudden breaks and in all honesty that takes you aback there was another problem hiding. I am here to tell you that if they really ever valued the relationship they probably would have communicated "the reaching of the upper limits" of the camel's capacity before reaching the breaking point.

In other words, if they can't be bothered to unload or deal with bad feelings or irritants with you, the relationship was probably not what you you thought in the first place. And I know this can come as a pretty startling surprise sometimes.

This becomes even more evident when an ongoing relationship that has had the usual peeks and valleys with the usual "transgressions" which have always been worked out, then all of a sudden the second party's camel's back drops. If you are confident that "the last straw" wasn't that big a transgression as to account for an immediate collapse, you have to re-evaluate the camel. Some judgment is required here to ensure that there haven't been a succession of major transgressions, so not much judgment is needed, just a good conscience.

This is where the metaphor gets interesting.

Perhaps the camel has aged. Or maybe it is simply sick or weak. In any case, you may have had a good chance to see just how strong the camel was up until now and have a decent ability to assess just how the camel has changed. So finally if your second party's tolerance just isn't up to it's own standards anymore, perhaps there is a message there that you should move on.

Because it becomes painfully obvious that despite your expectations, you've been told that you have gone too far. With no option to redeem it. It's broken.

Lastly, consider this: People are far more tolerant when they are unfulfilled, hungry and eager. People can become complacent and intolerant when they believe they either have everything they need elsewhere or have nothing to lose. So if the second party in your situation seems unreasonably unwilling to negotiate or deal with situations you should at least contemplate the idea that you have been somehow replaced in their needs.

Friday, January 20, 2012

To the root of routing



I have got all kinds of 2.4 Ghz wireless devices in my home. The cordless phones, the alarm system, the wifi not to mention the microwave oven. The effect this has on my wifi reception is not negligible. so I had to let go my dear old D-Link DIR-615 (whom by the way with the dd-wrt firmware is a beast in sheep's clothing) for a more powerful router.


My problem is twofold:

1) There's a buttload of other wifi's in range.

2) Interference: moving my router 4 feet, changed my RSSI by a level of 10.


All my network attached devices are located in my office at a point that corresponds to a corner in my office, so I cannot exactly afford to have the router very far from that point, so I needed a router that just blasted a good signal in the worse possible conditions. Here enters the buffalo wzr-hp-g450h. At a price point of about 75$ Canadian, this little powerhouse comes pre-loaded with dd-wrt "pro", which has literally tons of feature, I cannot even begin to list them. However I was much more concerned about range and signal clarity.


With it's 3 antennae and the choice of a "user friendly firmware", as opposed to the perhaps more daunting dd-wrt, when properly configured I gained 20 RSSI points. The user friendly firmware has a distinct advantage of giving you the best signal out of the box (without any major tweaking) though very similar results can be had with the DD-WRT firmware. If you are a propeller head like me you will enjoy tweaking it, but if not, it also has a nice guide and a user friendly firmware that will have you up and running in minutes.


Coming up next: The Patriot PCNASJV35S4 Javelin S4 NAS/Media Server (in the mail)

The New Phone



recently I got a Samsung SGH-T989D from Telus. Like the last 3 phones I got from them this one is more than adequate for my everyday needs. It's a beautiful and solid construction (though a bit thin for my meaty hands)

I am now a fervent adept of Android.



However also like the last 2 phones I've got, it's not without it's caveats.


1) The model of the phone doesn't play well with mods (or user made rom images)

2) The battery life of this device is Average to Poor. They advertize nearly a week of standby time and a day of talk time. I find this to be a stretch.


Wednesday, January 18, 2012

TV without TV

Edit:
I have to refer you to Lifehacker that did an amazing Job of explining how to make a media centre. They have included how to get your TV shows, so I think their post is most pertinent.

http://lifehacker.com/5894075/set-up-an-awe+inducing-media-center-this-weekend


I am like most people and love to be entertained. The internet has created a bit of a revolution in the entertainment world and a lot of institutions such as cable companies or mass media moguls are extremely threatened by it. With good reason.

The problem lies with the nature of information. It has a tendency to propagate. And whether it be hollywood or you local TV channel, in the day and age of digitizing everything, that propagation has an ideal vehicle: the world.wide.web.

The traditional distribution networks try to maintain a certain exclusivity to the access to the media they are gatekeepers to, and thus they milk it for very cent they can. In recent years, sole advertising revenue to the distributors has proven insufficient to their shareholders so distributions fees have been a major source of revenue. That's why there's 300 channels on you cable or satellite box, but there's nothing on and it's 40 to 60% advertising. Not only that, every year your supplier tries to increase their "distribution fees" by 10%, for essentially delivering exactly the same soup.

To many of the die hard TV and Movie fans this is patently insane.

Though it may be understandable that from the media producing industry protecting intellectual property may be vital, so much has been vested in this thought, that anything else seems tantamount to heresy. I mean forget selling a movie for a few dollars and make sure everyone sees it 3 or four times. They have now opted for licensing media containing the movie, to which you have no rights. (I mean literally, if you even try to make a backup of a DVD recent Canadian law would have you become a criminal.

The media industry have armies of legal groups, lawyers and politicians eager to pursue a single mom for millions in damage (which ultimately is more profitable than having produced a million copies of a movie and marketed, distributed and sold it). Anyhow that's just one of many aspects of the media industry that is apparently sick and deficient. Beyond that there are other reasons people are sick and fed up to be treated like cattle by the people that are supposed to cater to their whims. Keep in mind this is entertainment not health care...

Disclaimer:
All of the information pertained herein is solely for educational purposes. It should never be construed as a endorsement for illegal behavior or neither does it condone piracy. The important part to remember is that this is a discussion of theoretical application of technology.

Part one: Where is the media?
There are 5 main sources (in no particular order):
a) The web. Various links exist that allow download of media files. File sharing sites (not to be confused with torrent indexes, seen later) are websites where anyone can upload a file, pretty anonymously and then send a link to friends or family to download. Many file sharers opt for this because of the rather anonymous nature of the upload. I refer you to wikipedia's link on the subject: http://www.eostech.in/2011/11/list-of-all-free-file-sharing-and.html

b) The Usenet. This is a cousin of e-mail. It was designed to be used as a discussion billboard/forum with many topics. But just as e-mail, it allows the attachment of files and thus the propagation of all types of data is done this way. Many of the discussions that exist on the Usenet are discussions about media thus media circulates via those forums as well.

c) Peer to peer networking. Torrents. The apparition of peer to peer networking technologies in the last 5 years has had a bit of a revolutionary effect. Since the technology is designed to allow any data to be shared among hundreds and thousands of "peers" when a new peer joins the group, he receives the file from not one but thousands of sources simultaneously. Which is, arguably, the most efficient way to receive data.

d) You can "buy" it. Several online media stores exist, which will allow you to obtain, legally, a copy of media that you may be interested in. Notably Itunes from Apple and more recently Google's music store, to name a few. The caveat is that your are bound by all kinds of licenses and technologies that bind you. Either you are limited in the number of times or the timeframe when you can consume the media (such as renting a movie from Itunes) or the contract you agree to when obtaining the media binds you to using it on a single device. So, if you enjoy a tune on your phone you are legally prohibited to listen to it on your car stereo. Arguably, a DVD is probably the least prohibitive. DVDs are usable on television sets laptops and other dedicated devices (cars in asia have built-in DVD players) So since you carry a physical piece that contains the media you can play it on many devices and as many times as you want. The drawback is, the retail price of that media can end up being 6 to 10 times as a digital copy. With a production cost of merely a dollar more.

e) Last but not least: Over the AIR T.V. Yes, the good old TV antennae. But these days there's a twist: all over the air TV is digital and crystal clear. Often broadcasted in high definition and *GASP* it's FREE! Yes you sill have to put up with the commercials, but your could simply hook up your signal to a PVR and then, presto, you can fast forward through the commercials. In my opinion this is the best of all solutions because this allows you to legally obtain a digital copy of your show(s) or movie(s) and has the lowest inherent cost. Obtaining a PVR that will allow you to record and eventually edit and save the files to a secondary location, is a different matter.

Part 2: I am a media collector, help me organise it.
So you have managed to accumulate many digital files in which you have a mix of tv shows and movies (for example) how do you keep all of it ordered and organised?

Fortunately, there are many media fans out there that will share their knowledge and information about movies and TV shows. There are also websites that specialize in maintaining detailed information on movies or TV shows. These websites are all to happy to allow users to search for information on their favorite movie or TV shows.

Along with that there are enthusiasts that create (and sell) programs that help by automating the tasks of searching and classifying video files. In this section I will focus on one: Media Centre Master. It is not free, but has a one time lifetime license of 50$ and personally, I have paid for it.

The name of the software is probably derived from a new functionality that has been added in Microsoft's Windows latest flagship: Windows 7, called Media Centre. Not to be completely sidetracked (we will go into it later), but this little piece of software had the ambition of becoming a hub for all your media; pictures, music, videos and movies.One of the shortcomings of this, Windows Media Centre (in windows 7), is that the information about the media files it serves, is very brief and often a bit confusing. It has no real idea if a video file is a movie or a TV show, for instance, and if a file is not named in a familiar way it has no clue what the file is in the fist place.

In comes Media Centre Master. It uses some fairly robust algorithms to determine if a file, in a given folder, is a movie or a tv show. Once it has determined which one it is, it does a search on the internet about the show and obtains as much information about it as it can in order to classify, rename and store it in an organized fashion.

Consider this:

You have a folder on your computer called C:\AllMixedMedia
In this folder you have a mashup of movie and TV shows files.

You will indicate to Media Centre Master, that from now on, movies belong in
C:\Movies
and tvshows belong in
C:\TV
Media Centre Master will detect what is in C:\AllMixedMedia and move it to either C:\Movies or C:\TV accordingly.

Furthermore it will create subfolders:

C:\Movies\Movietitle (1999)\ in which the file will be placed in case of a movie
and
C:\TV\TvShowTitle\Season 1\ in which the files belonging to the first season of the show will be used.

Pretty amazing, huh?
Well it doesn't stop there. While it was originally purposed to organise your media, it can now go on the internet and try to see if new media exists and get the media for you. Not directly, but still.

It heavily relies on external programs for this task, principally uTorrent.

uTorrent is a very lightweight peer to peer filesharing software. You can run it for several days, weeks or months on a computer and it will not gob up all your resources. The computer will still run fine. Keep in mind it can pull massive amounts of data from the internet, so if you have an agreement with your internet provider that you will only transfer a specific amount of data per month, beware and limit the transfers in the application if needed.

So essentially, Media Centre Master will locate for you the "torrent" files that contain the peer networks that are likely to have your media. This file will be saved in a configured location on your computer (i.e.: C:\Torrents\)

Well now, when and if uTorrent is fired up, it can automatically peek into that folder and load up those torrents and obtain the media. And lastly and more importantly, when it has finished the downloads, it can relocate them to any other folder (for example C:\AllMixedMedia) which in turn Media Centre master will inspect and organize back where it should.

Part 3: So there you go, you got your media and it is organized... now, how can I watch it?
One of the options, which is not the least is plain old double-clicking on the file on the computer it was downloaded on. Though this might seem simple enough, this is hardly a convenient way to watch TV and movies, aways stuck in front of your computer or laptop. How about watching it comfortably?

This is party the reason that windows 7 had introduced Media Centre. It allowed you to connect intelligent TV's or other computers together and share the media. One notable example is the way the Microsoft's Xbox 360 videogame platform can locate a windows 7 computer and then allow you to watch the moves and TV shows from the remote computer, on the XBOX itself. There is one caveat though: the type of media that windows 7 serves, natively, is fairly restricted.

Again not to get too sidetracked, but video files come in many flavors. Often, they can be recognized by the extension of the file (or the last 3 digits making up the filename).
So video files can be; .AVI .MPG .MP4 .MKV .WMV .3GP and so on. As technology evolves the improvements on the files that contain video also evolve. Containing more and more data.

For instance, a .MKV file can contain several audio languages and also subtitles. An .AVI file cannot.
Another shortcoming of Windows media Centre on Windows 7: it does serve some .AVI files, and .WMV files but not .MKV files. This may be a dealbreaker for some.

Fortunately, more and more devices are able to serve media files in more formats. But to allow a shorter description of the technologies lets focus on 2 of them.

Device 1: A normal PC, connected to a TV screen.
This seems obvious, there are several small form factor PCs these days that can, unobtrusively be placed in the living room, out of sight and out of mind that can do a perfect job. However, if we consider what we have determined just a moment ago, windows 7, natively can only manage certain video files and that can cause us problems. Fortunately again, media enthusiasts have given us a free piece of software called XBMC. This little fellow can do it all and is free. Well worth the investigating. It can also replace windows 7 entirely, though, it will only allow to watch media files (no web browsing)!

Device 2: A media box. Lately, one can find all kinds of "media dedicated devices" that can replace a PC for the living room. Some of them may be in the form of a hard drive with connectivity features that allow you to plug it to your TV and comes with a remote. Some DVD players feature a network cable or a wireless interface that can connect to shared media on your network. These can be a bit of a hassle to set up originally, but one properly set up, will often offer the most user friendly approach.

In conclusion, with already existing and on the shelf technology, it is quite possible to have a set up that allows to watch television shows without the traditional inherent costs. Though it takes some doing and configuring several pieces of technology to work together, most of it is very affordable if not free. I will list below Useful links in order to get you set up, if this seem like a way you would like to go.


Software

Torrent program
Usenet Program
Media Centre Master
XBMC
Transcoders This allows to convert or stream live, from a non-supported video format, to a supported one

PVRs have a look at Hauppage's HD-PVR!
Digital TV Recievers To get free digital TV on older TVs you need this
Digital TV antenna More than just antenna, but useful info on what to choose.

Digital media playback devices:

Western Digital's media player
Small form factor PC's Peersonally I have the cheapest ZOTAC brand and it works well with XBMC
NEW: PC on a stick

Tutorials (work in progress)

How to set up a folder structure for media centre master
Configure the uTorrent "tab" in Media Centre Master
Configure Media Centre Master to download and parse Usenet

XBMC Media sharing:
XBMC Accessing Media over shared folders (samba)
XBMC Accessing Media via UPNP

Part 2: The Mechanics and Ethics of Humor

  Blog Series: Thoughts on Laughter and Humor Introduction In the first part of this series, we explored how laughter serves as a nervous re...